". . . one of the men said he had a book which 'told all about a great highway-man,' at the bottom of his chest, and producing it, I found, to my surprise and joy, that it was nothing else than Bulwer's Paul Clifford. This, I seized immediately, and going to my hammock, lay there, swinging and reading, until the watch was out. The between-decks were clear, the hatchways open, and a cool breeze blowing through them, the ship under easy way, and everything comfortable. I had just got well into the story, when eight bells were struck, and we were all ordered to dinner. After dinner came our watch on deck for four hours, and, at four o'clock, I went below again, turned into my hammock, and read until the dog watch. As no lights were allowed after eight o'clock, there was no reading in the night watch. Having light winds and calms, we were three days on the passage, and each watch below, during the daytime, I spent in the same manner, until I had finished my book. I shall never forget the enjoyment I derived from it. To come across anything with the slightest claims to literary merit, was so unusual, that this was a perfect feast to me. The brilliancy of the book, the succession of capital hits, lively and characteristic sketches, kept me in a constant state of pleasing sensations. It was far too good for a sailor. I could not expect such fine times to last long."
Gentle Reader, what do you think? What's to like or not like in the Bulwer's opening chapter?
What can an aspiring writer learn from him about the proper unfolding of a tale? By modern standards, his method is ponderous, even maddeningly slow. His language is filled with euphemisms and circumlocutions.
[Note: The Coming Race is credited with inspiring a secret society inside Hitler's SS, a society of hyper-zealots who believed in their innate superiority and the inevitability of their world dominance. I believe it was called the Vril Society, named after the power source that enables the Ana (pronounced Arna) to operate and govern their subterranean world (the Ana are also vegans). (Does anyone else out there know anything about this?) Lytton himself, by the way, in his social and political opinions, was extremely humane and in Parliament supported various reform policies. He would have been appalled to know what the Nazis did with his Utopian novel. (See Brian Aldiss's edition of The Coming Race, Broadview Press, 2002; or Matthew Sweet's Hesperus Press edition)]
There is a book out there about Lytton and his wife Rosina [Edward and Rosina by Michael Sadleir]. His mother so opposed the marriage that she temporarily disinherited him, and it was on his honeymoon in Italy that, out of financial desperation, he visited Pompeii, did research, and eventually wrote The Last Days of Pompeii. The biographer suggests that Lytton's mommy was right: Rosina was a nutcase (and Irish, to boot!). However, Bulwer and his wife seem to have deserved one another. For a generous treatment of an heroically dysfunctional marriage, see Leslie Mitchell's 2003 biography, Bulwer Lytton: The Rise and Fall of a Victorian Man of Letters.
Some more Bulwer-Lytton trivia: With works like The Last Days of Pompeii; Rienzi; Harold, Last of the Saxon Kings; and The Last of the Barons, he is credited with inventing the historical novel as we know it; that is, circumstantially accurate depictions of life in past times and cultures. The concern for such accuracy by Walter Scott (an unjustly neglected author) was negligible. B-L is also credited with coining the term "the great unwashed," the first known appearance of which occurs in The Coming Race. If Bulwer-Lytton was nothing else, he was interesting.]

